Women diagnosing a leaf in a field. Women diagnosing a leaf in a field.

External Program Evaluation: Rapid Outcomes from Agricultural Research (ROAR): Request for Proposal

Open Opportunity

This opportunity is now closed

About ROAR

The Rapid Outcomes from Agricultural Research (ROAR) program deploys urgent funding to support research and outreach in response to emerging or unanticipated threats to the nation’s food supply or agricultural systems. Specifically, FFAR’s ROAR Program funds rapid research related to response, prevention or mitigation of new pests and pathogens. The ROAR program is open year-round to eligible applicants, providing one-year grants up to $150,000 that must be matched by non-federal funds. Funds are awarded for the development of diagnostics, monitoring and mitigation strategies. The one year of funding fills urgent research gaps until traditional, longer-term funding can be secured. Since its inception, the ROAR program has awarded $6.7 million in total funding across 25 grants, with 21 completed as of May 2024. Awarded projects have addressed issues like invasive weevils, lettuce wilt, swine viruses and cattle ticks, among other pests and pathogens.

Program Aims

  1. Develop diagnostics, monitoring and mitigation strategies
  2. Advance outreach, research and other efforts to mitigate, contain or prevent a pest or pathogen outbreak
  3. Encourage swift grantmaking to spur a more effective, rapid field response
  4. Fill urgent research needs until traditional, longer-term funding can be secured
  5. Extend funding reach through matching requirement

Scope of Evaluation

FFAR seeks to evaluate the success of the ROAR program (i.e., program evaluation). The evaluator, in collaboration with FFAR, will define criteria and standards of success before finalizing the proposal and contract. In addition to evaluating the completed individual projects, the evaluation should also address the structure and FFAR’s management of the ROAR program, including program design, project selection criteria, timelines and award amounts.

We envision a high-level evaluation of the 21 completed projects and an in-depth evaluation of a subset (~7) of completed projects. We foresee the evaluator using a mixed-methods approach to include interviewing project grantees, project partners, matching funders and other project stakeholders, for example, a project’s target audience. Given the intended purpose of the ROAR program, the evaluator should also be qualified to quantify derived positive externalities of the work including avoided producer profit loss and/or avoided increase in consumer cost connected to some of the projects.

FFAR Will Provide

  • Contact information for grantees and project partners
  • Contact information for relevant FFAR staff
  • High-level budget information for ROAR program projects
  • Final reports submitted by grantees
  • Project proposals for grants that are still in progress

Other necessary data will be collected by the evaluator.

Evaluation Questions

  1. Is the ROAR program structure (e.g., type of research funded, funding amount, proposal turnaround time, match requirement, etc.) appropriate for addressing research and response needs for emerging or unanticipated agricultural threats?
  2. To what extent did ROAR-funded projects develop viable diagnostic, monitoring and mitigation strategies to emerging or unanticipated agricultural threats?
  3. To what extent has the ROAR program filled urgent research needs and allowed awardees to secure longer-term funding?
  4. To what extent were project results/outputs adopted or deployed in the field and what impact did the projects have on crop and animal production systems and/or the U.S. food supply (e.g., avoided disease-related costs)?

Evaluation Timeline & Products

Expected Products & Deliverables
  1. Evaluation criteria and standards that can apply to all ROAR program projects.
  2. Stakeholder interview transcripts and summarized findings.
  3. Detailed table/visual comparing how evaluated projects compared across criteria.
  4. Final report describing the ROAR program evaluation results, including details of the methods of evaluation.
  5. Summarized strengths and weaknesses of the structure and FFAR’s management of the ROAR program as well as recommendations for program modifications.
Estimated Project Timeline
  • Anticipated contract execution date: Monday, July 29, 2024
  • Define criteria and standards of success completed: Monday, July 29, 2024
  • Draft final report with program strengths and weaknesses: November 1, 2024
  • Final report and all deliverables: December 1, 2024
Proposal Process Timeline
  • Submission deadline: Friday, June 21, 2024, 5:00pm PDT
  • Applicant screening calls: June 26 – July 10, 2024
  • Finalist presentations and panel discussions: July 15 – July 19, 2024
Proposals Should Contain the Following Sections
  1. Applicant background/overview (1 page), including an indication of relevant expertise (animal or plant diseases, evaluative methods)
  2. Previous experience(s) of evaluation work with a similar scope (1 page)
  3. Description of your approach (up to 3 pages)
  4. Project budget (This project does not require matching funds.)
  5. Project timeline
  6. Project key personnel including roles and responsibilities
  7. Links to deliverables from past evaluation projects of a similar scope
  8. Client references
Screening Call Preparation

FFAR’s Impact Team will hold a 30-minute screening call with select applicants to assess alignment of the applicant’s experience with FFAR’s needs.

Finalist Presentation Preparation

FFAR will hold a 60-minute meeting (20-minutes presentation and 40-minute panel interview) with finalists via video conference. The presentation should highlight the applicant’s approach, including the criteria and standards they envision being used to measure the success of projects and the ROAR program as a whole. Additionally, the presentation should include a brief explanation of methods, followed by a showcase of how collected data may be visualized.

The panel discussion may be used to clarify the methods used for collection and analysis of data. Additionally, the panel may inquire about past projects and previous client relations to ensure the applicant and FFAR are a good fit.

FFAR welcomes individuals with any of the following expertise to apply: 1) animal disease, 2) plant disease or 3) evaluative methods. If beneficial to the success of the evaluation process, FFAR may match one or more individuals into a team.