To develop that proof, Dr. Stefan Gailans, PFI’s senior research manager, is coordinating on-farm trials in 90 locations across the Midwest to assess whether using regenerative agriculture can meet yield goals, allowing farmers to apply less nitrogen fertilizer. Economic outcomes will be calculated from budgets that compare the costs and returns for the comparison trial plots on each on-farm trial. Changes in GHG emissions will be calculated using Field to Market’s Fieldprint® Calculator.
Additionally, the research team will provide opportunities for trial participants to share their experiences with other Midwest farmers through field days, webinars and conferences. These experiences will also be shared through PFI’s existing cover crop cost-share programs and communications platforms to further encourage the good soil health adoption needed to reduce over-applications of nitrogen. Lastly, the research team will work with farmers and stakeholders to design prototype incentives to support regenerative agriculture products like yield- protection insurance and direct-payments.
“Asking farmers to reduce N inputs, especially to corn, is a tall order,” said Gailans. “This project will create a community of practice for farmers to test and share about their experiences with reducing N application rates.”
Gailans added that in Midwestern row-crop agriculture, reducing nitrogen fertilizer application is a more permanent, reliable and scalable approach to addressing climate change than carbon sequestration, the process of capturing and storing atmospheric carbon dioxide, because the science is not clear about whether management practices shown to potentially sequester carbon in one region or climate extend to all regions. Moreover, there is no guarantee that management practices that potentially sequester carbon will be maintained in the long-term.